EDITORIAL POLICY

Useful before optimized. Precise before exciting.

Our guides are written to answer real questions about artificial companions. Search visibility is valuable only when the page is accurate, readable, and distinct. We do not publish hidden text, mass query variants, invented statistics, or product rankings disguised as research.

Sources

We prefer manufacturer archives for product dates, government and standards bodies for regulation and safety, and peer-reviewed reviews for health or behavioral evidence. A source can establish what its publisher reported; it does not automatically prove every marketing claim it contains.

Evidence and uncertainty

We distinguish current consumer products, research prototypes, engineering practice, and forecasts. Health, education, childhood, and emotional-wellbeing pages state limitations and require specialist review before stronger intervention claims are added.

Dates and updates

Each article shows its publication and update date. Material changes to products, law, evidence, or source availability trigger a review. Forward-looking pages should be read in the context of their update date.

Corrections

Send a specific claim, page URL, and supporting source to hello@aipets.com. We correct verified errors in the article rather than preserving an edit-history narrative inside evergreen copy.